Is Buffett signaling the end for Apple? Are we looking at a short play ahead? Where’s Michael Burry?

Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway now holds its smallest position in Apple, $AAPL, since 2017. https://preview.redd.it/3maql47wdpgd1.png?width=1116&format=png&auto=webp&s=e90606d319d8e8187a836bf886d605f74bf55110 Currently, Berkshire Hathaway owns just 400 million shares of $AAPL, a 56% drop from the 906 million shares held in 2023. Since March 31st, Berkshire has reduced its Apple holdings from $135.4 billion to $84.2 billion. The rest of Berkshire’s top 5 holdings remain unchanged, according to Zerohedge. This indicates that Buffett specifically chose to sell $AAPL. Meanwhile, Berkshire Hathaway only bought back $345 million of its own stock in Q2, the lowest amount since 2018. Last quarter, Berkshire Hathaway sold a staggering $75.5 billion worth of stock, making it the largest quarterly sale in the company’s history, according to Zerohedge. https://preview.redd.it/avkipg12epgd1.png?width=1114&format=png&auto=webp&s=ae73d2478f8cb330a00c22787893794ed452b073 Buffett is now sitting on a record $277 billion in cash. To put this in perspective, Berkshire Hathaway now owns about 4% of all Treasury bills issued to the public. They even hold more T-Bills than the $195 billion on the Fed’s balance sheet. When Warren Buffett holds more T-Bills than the Fed itself, it’s clear he’s concerned. Brace yourself. Now, about the housing market. https://preview.redd.it/upe64kfndpgd1.png?width=838&format=png&auto=webp&s=2bb28ab1fe7ad0979de5c21f62b1b428b89a6c31 U.S. pending home sales dropped by 5.7% year-over-year in July, the largest decline in 9 months. Houston, Atlanta, and Minneapolis saw the biggest drops, with declines of 30.5%, 16.1%, and 15.2%, respectively. Pending home sales are now officially down 30% since 2021, despite mortgage rates falling to 6.8% from 7.2% in May. Additionally, 6.8% of homes on the market saw price drops in July, according to Redfin. Is the housing market finally cooling off? submitted by /u/XGramatik [link] [comments]

The 10-Year Note Yield experienced its largest weekly decline since the 2008 Financial Crisis, dropping 40 basis points last week.

Additionally, the average interest rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage fell by 22 basis points in just one day, on Friday. Meanwhile, $TLT, a widely followed bond-tracking ETF, surged by 6%, marking its biggest gain since January 2023. $TLT has now risen 2% year-to-date after being down over 10% just four months ago. For the first time since 2020, the bond markets are behaving as if we’re heading into a recession. So much for a “soft landing.” submitted by /u/AdLow8046 [link] [comments]

Increasing popularity of safe-haven stocks

https://preview.redd.it/66112uaxdogd1.jpg?width=863&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4a07202423f509469b5830de6b1c29abc7d1ecde On Friday, 74% of companies in the Utilities sector reached a new 52-week high, the highest percentage since March 2019. This is the fifth-largest share over the past 14 years. As the stock market sell-off intensified, investors shifted their capital into more defensive stocks like utilities. Consequently, the S&P 500 Utilities sector rallied by 4.4% over the past week and is now up 17.1% year-to-date. submitted by /u/FXgram_ [link] [comments]

Pepperstone, Chris Weston: A Traders’ Week Ahead Playbook – Markets to go after a more prolific central bank response

Authored by Chris Weston With broad market volatility coming alive, and with uncertainty rising, we ask whether the economic data this week can lead to calmer conditions and a turn in sentiment and direction. Or whether the ugly moves seen in so many of our key markets morph into something even more sinister, with the market starting to go after a more emphatic central bank response. As many try to model the extent of the US and synchronized global growth slowdown, we’re at a point in the cycle where market players are facing an inability to price certainty and risk. In turn, the would-be buyers of risk stand aside, resulting in a deterioration in liquidity conditions and violent price action, de-risking, and further hedging of portfolios. What really matters now is whether money managers and traders feel sentiment has become too pessimistic, or if this deleveraging and risk aversion manifests into even higher volatility and drawdown. To answer this pertinent question the market needs to see the outcome of the data to offer increased confidence to price the risk of recession, and how that may feed into earnings expectations, consumer behaviours and business decisions. If we are going to look at the data this week that has the potential influence, then the US ISM services, US weekly jobless claims and US SLOOS (Senior Loan Officer Survey) would be event risks I instinctively see as having the potentially move the dial. US and European corporate earnings also come in thick and fast, but while these will offer idiosyncratic pockets of volatility in individual names, there should be limited read-through into broad market volatility. The unwind of a 9-month low vol grind higher in risky assets What we’ve witnessed and what many have traded, is really a case of slowly, slowly then all at once. In essence, the explosion in volatility has been the result of a 9-month grind higher in global equity bourses – and notably those within the US, Japanese and the equity indices with a large weighting to tech and high growth – where pension and hedge funds have run short volatility strategies to enhance returns. Improved earnings expectations, the reassurance of ‘the Fed put’, and a consensus view that the US economy was moving towards a soft landing -have seen pullbacks in equity and carry strategies well supported, with active players chasing price when the bullish momentum resumed. Is this time different? The US and global data flow has been slowing for several months, but after last week’s poor US ISM manufacturing report, the rise in US weekly jobless claims, a weak nonfarm payrolls report (with the Sahm rule triggered), and Intel laying off 15,000 employees, some in the market are asking if the US is already in recession. The question of whether the Fed has kept rates too high for too long is also in the mix, with increased debate around whether we’re seeing evidence of a policy mistake from the Fed. The bulls will point out that this is not the first time in the past three years that market participants have priced a high chance of US recession risk. However, the dynamic unfolding in markets does have a different feel to other episodes. We’ve opined many times before that there is a key difference between the Fed cutting rates towards a neutral setting for insurance purposes, relative to a scenario where the Fed front load rate cuts and pull out more ‘emergency’ measures. US interest rate swap pricing emergency action US interest rate swaps now price almost 50bp of cuts for the September FOMC meeting, and 115bp of cuts by December – essentially portraying two 50bp cuts and one 25bp cut this year, which can clearly be considered more of an ‘emergency’ measure. Many have bought into the US 2yr Treasury, where yields fell an incredible 27bp on Friday, and 50bp on the week. This has resulted in the US Treasury yield curve (2s vs 10s) aggressively steeping on the week and where having been ‘inverted’ since July 2022 (i.e. short-term yields are higher than long-term Treasury yields) we’re now looking at the yield curve turning positive – statistically a signal that recession risk is rising. In equity, we’ve seen a sharp drawdown (and underperformance) from US small caps, consumer discretionary names, high beta equity plays and low-quality equity, with a solid flight into staples. In the FX markets, we’ve all witnessed an incredible unwind of the JPY-funded carry trade and this is feeding into huge selling of Japanese equities, which is also weighing on other DM equity markets. Markets to go after the Fed This is a market that feels the Fed and other central banks need to move out of a restrictive policy setting, and with a real sense of urgency. If they don’t sense that urgency, then markets will go after central banks and take their pound of flash. The economic concerns have spread into the corporate credit markets, with US high yield spreads widening 34bp on Friday (53bp on the week, and while at 3.59% are not yet at truly worrying levels, if the rate of change and the deterioration in the credit markets continues then equity will not take it kindly. Multi-asset implied volatility – G10 FX, VIX index, Gold We can see in the options market huge hedging activity, where notably the VIX index (S&P500 30-day implied volatility) went on a wild ride on Friday pushing into 30%, before settling at 23.4%. The VIX at 23% implies a move weekly move in the S&P500 of -/+3.3%, and for those who like two-way intraday trading opportunity, this is an almost nirvana level of volatility. A VIX index above 30% – should it occur – suggests intraday moves can get a little wild and traders need to be in front of the platform to react dynamically. This level of volatility also typically leads to reduced liquidity in order books, which can perpetuate movement and lead to wider bid-offer spreads and… Continue reading Pepperstone, Chris Weston: A Traders’ Week Ahead Playbook – Markets to go after a more prolific central bank response

The Sahm Rule recession indicator climbed to 0.53 in July, up from 0.43, indicating that the U.S. economy may be in a recession.

https://preview.redd.it/vns2dx0auggd1.png?width=862&format=png&auto=webp&s=d0b828f57fb805a45eba3dfae873fd9ee68cbf50 This rule predicts a recession when the unemployment rate rises by 0.5 percentage points from its lowest level in the past 12 months. With the unemployment rate increasing to 4.3% in July from 4.1% in June, the Sahm Rule has been triggered. In the past 65 years, this indicator has never given a false signal. Moreover, every time the threshold has been crossed, the rise in the unemployment rate has accelerated. Are we already experiencing a recession? submitted by /u/XGramatik [link] [comments]

Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway discloses sale of nearly 50% of their Apple ($AAPL) shares, now holding a record $277 billion in cash.

https://preview.redd.it/qoz37sdqsggd1.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=9187b754260113af831d0b80e900a66af4239b11 Buffett’s position in $AAPL was reduced by $86 BILLION. Months ago, Buffett said selling “a little Apple” would be beneficial in case capital gains tax rates rise. However, offloading 50% of his position is not “a little” sale. submitted by /u/XGramatik [link] [comments]

Hedge fund Elliott says AI is ‘overhyped’, Nvidia stock ‘a bubble’

Nvidia stock is in a “bubble” and its rally is being driven by an “overhyped” AI technology, hedge fund Elliott Management has told investors in a letter seen by the Financial Times. The hedge fund, which manages around $70 billion in assets, reportedly said that mega-cap tech stocks including NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) are in “bubble land,” voicing skepticism that the high-volume purchases of Nvidia’s graphics processing units by Big Tech companies will continue. submitted by /u/Ankle_be [link] [comments]

Could Apple’s stock plummet?

Warren Buffett cuts Berkshire Hathaway’s ($BRKb) investment in Apple ($AAPL) by 50% in the second quarter, reducing the number of shares from 789 million to about 400 million. Warren Buffett rarely sells early, accordingly, I would venture to guess that either he has found a better asset to invest in or he thinks Apple stock is close to falling. What do you think about it? submitted by /u/dll_crypto [link] [comments]

“Easy Choice”: Tether Boss Picks Bitcoin Over Ethereum

In a social media post, Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino has dismissed the idea of allocating a portion of the company’s profits to Ethereum, the second-biggest cryptocurrency by market cap. Ardoino has picked Bitcoin over Ethereum due to the former’s immutability and limited supply. “Bitcoin is immutable. Only 21 million coins. Easy choice,” he said. https://preview.redd.it/dhyglk4lpfgd1.png?width=735&format=png&auto=webp&s=a72d0d04dfd5300a35c9d282807aa7c57d9cf151 submitted by /u/Lor1al [link] [comments]

Trump’s victory could push Bitcoin toward $80,000 In this article, I will discuss how the re-election of Donald Trump can affect the bitcoin exchange rate and why most investors consider this event positive for the cryptocurrency market.

The re-election of Donald Trump and its impact on Bitcoin Introduction With the return of Donald Trump to the political arena, more and more experts are wondering about the possible impact of his re-election on the financial markets, especially cryptocurrencies. AMBCrypto conducted an extensive survey to find out investors’ opinions on how Trump’s re-election could affect the bitcoin exchange rate. Investor Survey: Views and Expectations The majority of investors surveyed, namely 80% of the 9,375 participants, are of the opinion that Donald Trump’s re-election as US President will be the catalyst for a significant rise in the bitcoin exchange rate, which could reach the $80,000 mark. They support their opinion with the following arguments: 🔹Support for new technologies: Trump is known for his favorability to new technologies, which can create favorable conditions for the development of cryptocurrencies. 🔹Innovative approach: Trump’s policies often include innovative solutions that can help build confidence in digital assets. 🔹Economic stability: His re-election is expected to bring economic stability, which will have a positive impact on the cryptocurrency market. Most investors are confident that Trump’s re-election will have a positive impact on the bitcoin exchange rate, underscoring their belief in sustainable growth for digital assets. Concerns about Bitcoin price growth The remaining 20% of survey participants expressed concerns that Donald Trump’s re-election could pose some risks to bitcoin. They believe that possible political decisions and changes in the regulatory environment could have a negative impact on the cryptocurrency market, leading to instability and volatility. The main reasons for their concerns include: 🔹Regulatory changes: New laws and regulations related to cryptocurrencies could restrict their use and cause a downturn in the market. 🔹Political uncertainty: Unexpected political decisions could lead to sharp fluctuations in the bitcoin exchange rate. 🔹Risks for investors: Tighter regulatory measures could scare away investors and reduce trading volumes on cryptocurrency exchanges. A minority of investors see Trump’s re-election as potential threats to bitcoin’s stability, pointing to the importance of the political environment and its impact on the digital asset market. Bitcoin’s network performance Experts have conducted a detailed analysis of bitcoin’s network performance in recent months and highlighted several key points that indicate positive trends. Key observations from the experts include: 🔹Positive futures funding rates: Since May this year, there has been a steady increase in funding rates, indicating traders’ faith in bitcoin’s price appreciation. 🔹Market Confidence: Investors remain optimistic about bitcoin’s long-term growth despite current fluctuations. 🔹Attention to the political situation: Ahead of the US presidential election, investors are closely watching political developments, expecting that they may significantly affect the cryptocurrency market. Network analysis confirms the market’s confidence in bitcoin’s future growth despite possible political uncertainties. You can also read Schiff’s opinion on the future of Bitcoin, read more here. The impact of political events, such as the possible re-election of Donald Trump, on the cryptocurrency market remains an important factor closely monitored by investors. Most of them are confident of a positive effect for bitcoin, as evidenced by current trends and network indicators. However, there remains a sliver of doubt related to potential risks. Meanwhile, cryptocurrency projects such as Solana and destinations such as GameFi continue to show strong growth, strengthening their position in the market. https://preview.redd.it/ub3a3ukeqfgd1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=4559610703518032e1bf79292fd493916eba0cda submitted by /u/Lor1al [link] [comments]

China’s Economic Situation.

Deloitte United States: China’s economy showed signs of deceleration in the second quarter of 2024, with a GDP growth rate of 4.7% compared to 5.3% in the first quarter. This slowdown is attributed to weak domestic demand, issues in the residential property market, and stagnant private sector investment. Despite rapid growth in exports, there are concerns about potential new trade restrictions from the US and the EU​ submitted by /u/Ankle_be [link] [comments]

Over the last week. How is this a “soft landing?”

Over the last week: Japan’s stock market posted its largest daily drop since 2020 US unemployment rate rises to 4.3%, highest in 3 years Starbucks, SBUX, reports a 6% decline in store traffic Intel, INTC, erases one third of its value in 1 day Amazon, AMZN, falls on lower than expected revenue 10-year note yield falls 40+ basis points in 1 week The ISM Manufacturing Index fell to 46.8, its lowest level since August 2023 How is this a “soft landing?” submitted by /u/zealockzinim [link] [comments]